The paper aims to elucidate the main features of Norman contribution to the First Crusade. A peculiar attention is devoted to scrutinize the historiographical tradition concerning the events that leads to the Conquest of Jerusalem in 1099; in fact, the Norman contribution was scarsely defined by all chroniclers. The history of the First Crusade is a typical example of selection of memory according a political agenda developed by different chroniclers (Anna Comnena, Geoffrey Malaterra, Ibn Al-Athir). They preferred to misunderstand the role of Bohemond of Hauteville and the others Norman warriors and emphasized other issues.
Il mito della crociata nel Mezzogiorno normanno tra i secoli XI-XII
Russo L
2016-01-01
Abstract
The paper aims to elucidate the main features of Norman contribution to the First Crusade. A peculiar attention is devoted to scrutinize the historiographical tradition concerning the events that leads to the Conquest of Jerusalem in 1099; in fact, the Norman contribution was scarsely defined by all chroniclers. The history of the First Crusade is a typical example of selection of memory according a political agenda developed by different chroniclers (Anna Comnena, Geoffrey Malaterra, Ibn Al-Athir). They preferred to misunderstand the role of Bohemond of Hauteville and the others Norman warriors and emphasized other issues.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Russo.pdf
non disponibili
Dimensione
495.45 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
495.45 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.