The paper aims to elucidate the main features of Norman contribution to the First Crusade. A peculiar attention is devoted to scrutinize the historiographical tradition concerning the events that leads to the Conquest of Jerusalem in 1099; in fact, the Norman contribution was scarsely defined by all chroniclers. The history of the First Crusade is a typical example of selection of memory according a political agenda developed by different chroniclers (Anna Comnena, Geoffrey Malaterra, Ibn Al-Athir). They preferred to misunderstand the role of Bohemond of Hauteville and the others Norman warriors and emphasized other issues.

Il mito della crociata nel Mezzogiorno normanno tra i secoli XI-XII

Russo L
2016-01-01

Abstract

The paper aims to elucidate the main features of Norman contribution to the First Crusade. A peculiar attention is devoted to scrutinize the historiographical tradition concerning the events that leads to the Conquest of Jerusalem in 1099; in fact, the Norman contribution was scarsely defined by all chroniclers. The history of the First Crusade is a typical example of selection of memory according a political agenda developed by different chroniclers (Anna Comnena, Geoffrey Malaterra, Ibn Al-Athir). They preferred to misunderstand the role of Bohemond of Hauteville and the others Norman warriors and emphasized other issues.
2016
9788894052732
Crusade
Normans
Bohemond
Historiography
Myth
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Russo.pdf

non disponibili

Dimensione 495.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
495.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14092/2402
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact