Background: Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a chronic and progressive fibroproliferative disease consisting of the progressive pathological fibrosis of the palmar fascia leading to permanent flexion and deficit of extension, with marked deformity and severe disability. Among treatment options, conservative and infiltrative therapies, physiotherapy, or surgery, with less invasive surgical options, are reported. The therapeutic planning, shared with the patient, must consider the severity of the disease, surgical risks, the functional, aesthetic, and occupational consequences, and the risk of recurrence. Case report: We describe a complicated clinical case that led her to a claim for compensation under presumed medical professional liability profiles. A female patient, 32-years-old, suffering from early symptomatic DD in the left non-dominant hand, underwent to palmar fasciotomy complicated by severe paraesthesia. In the re-surgery, vascular and nerve injury was found, leading to permanent disabling sequelae. Discussion: The early stage of DD, although symptomatic, without previous medical or infiltrative therapy, in a young subject with insulin-dependent diabetes and a high risk of recurrence contraindicated the surgical approach, especially palmar fasciotomy, according to the best evidence. The vascular-nervous lesion in the hand palm indicated a censurable surgical execution technique. The technical consultation ascertained the causal relationship between impairments and surgical malpractice, followed by compensation. Conclusion: The analysis of this case highlights the value of informed clinical practice to provide optimal care and mitigate the risks associated with the management of DD. The choice of possible treatment options must be tailored to the patient in accordance with the best evidence.
Medico-legal evaluation of a claim for Dupuytren's disease treatment: indication for surgery based on best evidence
Tronconi LP;
2024-01-01
Abstract
Background: Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a chronic and progressive fibroproliferative disease consisting of the progressive pathological fibrosis of the palmar fascia leading to permanent flexion and deficit of extension, with marked deformity and severe disability. Among treatment options, conservative and infiltrative therapies, physiotherapy, or surgery, with less invasive surgical options, are reported. The therapeutic planning, shared with the patient, must consider the severity of the disease, surgical risks, the functional, aesthetic, and occupational consequences, and the risk of recurrence. Case report: We describe a complicated clinical case that led her to a claim for compensation under presumed medical professional liability profiles. A female patient, 32-years-old, suffering from early symptomatic DD in the left non-dominant hand, underwent to palmar fasciotomy complicated by severe paraesthesia. In the re-surgery, vascular and nerve injury was found, leading to permanent disabling sequelae. Discussion: The early stage of DD, although symptomatic, without previous medical or infiltrative therapy, in a young subject with insulin-dependent diabetes and a high risk of recurrence contraindicated the surgical approach, especially palmar fasciotomy, according to the best evidence. The vascular-nervous lesion in the hand palm indicated a censurable surgical execution technique. The technical consultation ascertained the causal relationship between impairments and surgical malpractice, followed by compensation. Conclusion: The analysis of this case highlights the value of informed clinical practice to provide optimal care and mitigate the risks associated with the management of DD. The choice of possible treatment options must be tailored to the patient in accordance with the best evidence.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
